Menu Close

According-to-Wikipedia-and-WolframAlpha-the-sign-function-sgn-x-is-defined-as-sgn-x-x-x-x-x-for-x-0-and-satisfies-sgn-x-x-1-x-but-sgn-0-0-In-short-sgn-x-1-f




Question Number 2400 by Filup last updated on 19/Nov/15
According to Wikipedia and WolframAlpha,  the sign function, sgn(x), is defined as:    sgn(x)≡(x/(∣x∣))=((∣x∣)/x)   for x≠0  and satisfies:  sgn(x)=(√x)(√(1/x))  but  sgn(0)=0    In short:    sgn(x)= { ((1     for x>0)),((0     for x=0)),((−1 for x<0)) :}    Why does sgn(0)=0?
AccordingtoWikipediaandWolframAlpha,thesignfunction,sgn(x),isdefinedas:sgn(x)xx=xxforx0andsatisfies:sgn(x)=x1xbutsgn(0)=0Inshort:sgn(x)={1forx>00forx=01forx<0Whydoessgn(0)=0?
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 19/Nov/15
How does sgn(x) satisfy     sgn(x)=(√x)(√(1/x))   ?  For example sgn(−6)=−1  So       −1=(√(−6))(√(1/(−6)))                     =i(√6)×(1/(i(√6)))                     =1?
Howdoessgn(x)satisfysgn(x)=x1x?Forexamplesgn(6)=1So1=616=i6×1i6=1?
Commented by Filup last updated on 20/Nov/15
I′m not sure how it satisfies. That was  Just what I found online
Imnotsurehowitsatisfies.ThatwasJustwhatIfoundonline
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 20/Nov/15
Why does sgn(0)=0?  An Interpretation for  sgn(0)=0  Here 1,0,−1 are  representative_(−)   elements only.   • ′1′  represents the situation x>0   •Opposite situation x<0 is represented by ′ −1 ′ (which is     opposite of ′ 1 ′ )  • x=0 is neutral situation which should be represented      by neutral element that is ′ 0 ′
Whydoessgn(0)=0?AnInterpretationforsgn(0)=0Here1,0,1arerepresentativeelementsonly.1representsthesituationx>0Oppositesituationx<0isrepresentedby1(whichisoppositeof1)x=0isneutralsituationwhichshouldberepresentedbyneutralelementthatis0
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 20/Nov/15
sgn(x)=(√x)(√(1/x)) is correct  sgn(−6)=(√(−6))×(√(−(1/6)))=−1 (and not 1)  (√(−6))=i(√6)  (√(−(1/6)))=i(1/( (√6)))
sgn(x)=x1xiscorrectsgn(6)=6×16=1(andnot1)6=i616=i16
Answered by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
for a certain things and simetry, read  the definition for complex sign :D  −−−− curiosity  it as generalized to C by/  sgn z=(z/(∣z∣))  this act like a vercsor for complex number  also  sgn z=e^(−ıarg z)   arg 0 is undefined because unlike  z=1=e^(2πkı) ,k∈Z (k=0 is principal argument, 0≤θ<2π)  z=0=0e^(ıθ) ,∀θ∈R  you can pick all angle you want.
foracertainthingsandsimetry,readthedefinitionforcomplexsign:DcuriosityitasgeneralizedtoCby/sgnz=zzthisactlikeavercsorforcomplexnumberalsosgnz=eıargzarg0isundefinedbecauseunlikez=1=e2πkı,kZ(k=0isprincipalargument,0θ<2π)z=0=0eıθ,θRyoucanpickallangleyouwant.
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 19/Nov/15
I didn′t understand somethings:  •this act like a vercsor for complex number  What is vercsor?  •also if you take arg 0=0(wich is undefined)  its flows natural   What does this mean?  Overall the coment is knowledge−increasing.  The idea of generalization of sign to comlex   numbers is inspiring!
Ididntunderstandsomethings:thisactlikeavercsorforcomplexnumberWhatisvercsor?alsoifyoutakearg0=0(wichisundefined)itsflowsnaturalWhatdoesthismean?Overallthecomentisknowledgeincreasing.Theideaofgeneralizationofsigntocomlexnumbersisinspiring!
Commented by Filup last updated on 19/Nov/15
What is arg(z)?  I′ve seen it before
Whatisarg(z)?Iveseenitbefore
Commented by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
the argument of the complex number  if you consider the complex a vector  it is the angle of it and the real axis
theargumentofthecomplexnumberifyouconsiderthecomplexavectoritistheangleofitandtherealaxis
Commented by Filup last updated on 19/Nov/15
I see. I haven′t leant much on the complex  plane, so this interests me. I′ll have to  take a look at complex mathematics!
Isee.Ihaventleantmuchonthecomplexplane,sothisinterestsme.Illhavetotakealookatcomplexmathematics!
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 19/Nov/15
THank^S
THankS
Commented by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
vecsor is a vector with unitary module  its ussefull if you want only the direction  of a thing  f_g =G((m_1 m_2 )/(∣r_(12) ^→ ∣))r_(12) ^�   the vecsor r_(12) ^�  only give the direction,  this is the gravitational force into body  1  for the segund  thinked wrong XD  sorry for that
vecsorisavectorwithunitarymoduleitsussefullifyouwantonlythedirectionofathingfg=Gm1m2r12r^12thevecsorr^12onlygivethedirection,thisisthegravitationalforceintobody1forthesegundthinkedwrongXDsorryforthat
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 20/Nov/15
I want to understand clearly:  If z=a+ib then  sgn(a+ib)=((a+ib)/(∣a+ib∣))=(a/( (√(a^2 +b^2 ))))+((ib)/( (√(a^2 +b^2 ))))  Clearly  all z having same ∣z∣ have same sgn(z)!  Do all complex numbers having same absolute value  have same sign?
Iwanttounderstandclearly:Ifz=a+ibthensgn(a+ib)=a+iba+ib=aa2+b2+iba2+b2Clearlyallzhavingsamezhavesamesgn(z)!Doallcomplexnumbershavingsameabsolutevaluehavesamesign?
Commented by Filup last updated on 20/Nov/15
Absolute Value  z_1 =a_1 +b_1 i    ∣    z_2 =a_2 +b_2 i  ∣z_1 ∣=(√(a_1 ^2 +b_1 ^2 ))    ∣    ∣z_2 ∣=(√(a_2 ^2 +b_2 ^2 ))  ∣z_1 ∣≥0    ∣    ∣z_2 ∣≥0  assume ∣z_1 ∣=∣z_2 ∣    Sign  sgn(z_1 )=e^(i arg(z_1 ))   sgn(z_2 )=e^(i arg(z_2 ))     if when complex functions with equal abs. values  are equal, the sgn are equal, then:    for ∣z_1 ∣=∣z_2 ∣  e^(i arg(z_1 )) =e^(i arg(z_2 ))   ∴arg(z_1 )=arg(z_2 )  arg(a_1 +b_1 i)=arg(a_2 +b_2 i)  (?)
AbsoluteValuez1=a1+b1iz2=a2+b2iz1∣=a12+b12z2∣=a22+b22z1∣⩾0z2∣⩾0assumez1∣=∣z2Signsgn(z1)=eiarg(z1)sgn(z2)=eiarg(z2)ifwhencomplexfunctionswithequalabs.valuesareequal,thesgnareequal,then:forz1∣=∣z2eiarg(z1)=eiarg(z2)arg(z1)=arg(z2)arg(a1+b1i)=arg(a2+b2i)(?)
Commented by 123456 last updated on 20/Nov/15
z_1  and z_2  have same sign only if  ∃λ∈R,0<λ<+∞ such that  z_2 =λz_1
z1andz2havesamesignonlyifλR,0<λ<+suchthatz2=λz1
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 20/Nov/15
z_1 =a_1 +ib_1   arg (z)=arctan(a_1 ,b_1 )  Individual sign of a_1  and b_1 are important.  On Rasheed′s comment  all z having the same ∣z∣ does not mean  same sgn(z)  z_1 =3+4i, z_2 =4+3i  sgn(z_1 )=.6+.8i, sgn(z_2 )=.8+.6i
z1=a1+ib1arg(z)=arctan(a1,b1)Individualsignofa1andb1areimportant.OnRasheedscommentallzhavingthesamezdoesnotmeansamesgn(z)z1=3+4i,z2=4+3isgn(z1)=.6+.8i,sgn(z2)=.8+.6i
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 20/Nov/15
THANKS  To All of  You!   I  Was  In MisUnderstanding.
THANKSToAllofYou!IWasInMisUnderstanding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *