Menu Close

f-0-1-R-x-a-0-a-1-a-2-a-3-f-x-i-0-a-i-is-f-x-continuous-in-all-x-0-1-f-0-9999-f-1-1-




Question Number 2393 by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
f:[0,1]→R  x=a_0 ,a_1 a_2 a_3 ...  f(x)=Σ_(i=0) ^(+∞) a_i   is f(x) continuous in all x∈[0,1]  f(0,9999...)=??  f(1)=1
f:[0,1]Rx=a0,a1a2a3f(x)=+i=0aiisf(x)continuousinallx[0,1]f(0,9999)=??f(1)=1
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 19/Nov/15
f(x) is not continous is limit does not  exists for irrational x and also for rational  x= p/q where q≠2^n 5^m
f(x)isnotcontinousislimitdoesnotexistsforirrationalxandalsoforrationalx=p/qwhereq2n5m
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 19/Nov/15
I don′t think there is any real number like  0.99999.... (infinite times). It is  same as 1.
Idontthinkthereisanyrealnumberlike0.99999.(infinitetimes).Itissameas1.
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 19/Nov/15
What i mean is 0.999.. is a recurring decimal  and hence rational. The rational number  representing this number is 1.   This is different from other rationals  like 1/3. which can be represented both  in recurring decimal and fraction notation.  So for example  0.49999999999...(infinite times)=1/2
Whatimeanis0.999..isarecurringdecimalandhencerational.Therationalnumberrepresentingthisnumberis1.Thisisdifferentfromotherrationalslike1/3.whichcanberepresentedbothinrecurringdecimalandfractionnotation.Soforexample0.49999999999(infinitetimes)=1/2
Answered by Filup last updated on 19/Nov/15
0.9^−  is exactly equal to 1.  Because of the infinite number of 9′s  being appended, this makes it entirely  equal.    Think about it like this:  If 1≠0.9^− , then:  0.9^− =0.999...9990000^− ... which is  contradictory against the definition  of recurring decimals. ALL recurring  decimals are rational, thus:  f(0.9^− )=f(1)   iff   0.9^−  is appended infinitly!
0.9isexactlyequalto1.Becauseoftheinfinitenumberof9sbeingappended,thismakesitentirelyequal.Thinkaboutitlikethis:If10.9,then:0.9=0.9999990000whichiscontradictoryagainstthedefinitionofrecurringdecimals.ALLrecurringdecimalsarerational,thus:f(0.9)=f(1)iff0.9isappendedinfinitly!
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 19/Nov/15
Correct.  0.49^− =1/2  0.9^− =1.  1/2  =.5
Correct.0.49=1/20.9=1.1/2=.5
Commented by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
0,49^� =(1/2)  0,4+x=(1/2)  (2/5)+x=(1/2)  x=(1/2)−(2/5)=((5−4)/(10))=(1/(10))=0,1
0,49¯=120,4+x=1225+x=12x=1225=5410=110=0,1
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 20/Nov/15
0.1111×9=.9999  (1/9)=0.1111.....  (1/9)×9=0.99999.....  But 0.9^−  and 1 are same numbers.  f(x)=Σ_(i=0) ^∞ a_i   if x=a_0 .a_1 a_2 ....  f(0.9^− )=?
0.1111×9=.999919=0.1111..19×9=0.99999..But0.9and1aresamenumbers.f(x)=i=0aiifx=a0.a1a2.f(0.9)=?
Commented by RasheedAhmad last updated on 19/Nov/15
One difference between 0.9_(−) ^(−)   and 0.3_(−) ^(−)   0.3^(−)  can be achieved by actual  division process.  1÷3=0.3^(−)   But 0.9^(−)  cannot be achieved by  actual process of division  of any two integers.  0.9^(−) =1=(1/1)  1÷1 doesn′t yield 0.9999...  it is simply 1  0.49^(−)  is also like 0.9^(−)   It cannot be achieved by actual  process of division of any two  integers.  1÷2 doesn′t yield 0.49999...  it is simply 0.5
Onedifferencebetween0.9and0.30.3canbeachievedbyactualdivisionprocess.1÷3=0.3But0.9cannotbeachievedbyactualprocessofdivisionofanytwointegers.0.9=1=111÷1doesntyield0.9999itissimply10.49isalsolike0.9Itcannotbeachievedbyactualprocessofdivisionofanytwointegers.1÷2doesntyield0.49999itissimply0.5
Commented by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
(a/9)=0,a^�    a∈{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9?}  (9/9)=0,9999...  9∣9  0  1  9∣9  90⌊0,99...  81    90    81      ⋮  4∣4  40 ⌊0,9...  36     40      ⋮
a9=0,a¯a{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9?}99=0,9999990199900,9981908144400,93640
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 20/Nov/15
′V Nice!′  for your deep approach!  You have successfully showed/proved in various ways  that           0.9^(−) =1  Actually I don′t deny the above. I only pointed out  the difference between 0.3^(−)   and  0.9^(−)   0.3^(−)  is the result of ordinary  division of two integers  1÷3=0.3333...  whereas  0.9^(−)   is not.  You have also tried to show that 0.9^(−)  can be achieved  by ordinary  division (9÷9) but in this connection you  haven′t followed some rules of ordinary division.  So I think 0.9^(−) ,0.49^(−)   etc aren′t achievable by ordinary_(−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−)   division of two integers._(−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−)
VNice!foryourdeepapproach!Youhavesuccessfullyshowed/provedinvariouswaysthat0.9=1ActuallyIdontdenytheabove.Ionlypointedoutthedifferencebetween0.3and0.90.3istheresultofordinarydivisionoftwointegers1÷3=0.3333whereas0.9isnot.Youhavealsotriedtoshowthat0.9canbeachievedbyordinarydivision(9÷9)butinthisconnectionyouhaventfollowedsomerulesofordinarydivision.SoIthink0.9,0.49etcarentachievablebyordinarydivisionoftwointegers.
Commented by 123456 last updated on 19/Nov/15
0,9999...  =9/10+9/10^2 +...  =((9/10)/(1−1/10))=((9/10)/(9/10))=1 (infinite pg)  or  s=0,999....  10s=9,999....  9s=9  s=1  ps:  1=0,11111111...._2   since  Σ_(i=1) ^(+∞) (1/2^i )=((1/2)/(1−1/2))=1  if f doenst is continuous them (dont sure)  lim_(n→+∞)  f(x_n )≠f(lim_(n→+∞)  x_n ) in general  them this have something about  f(0,99...) and f(1) or  ⌊0,999...⌋ and ⌊1⌋  or i think it have :v
0,9999=9/10+9/102+=9/1011/10=9/109/10=1(infinitepg)ors=0,999.10s=9,999.9s=9s=1ps:1=0,11111111.2since+i=112i=1/211/2=1iffdoenstiscontinuousthem(dontsure)limn+f(xn)f(limn+xn)ingeneralthemthishavesomethingaboutf(0,99)andf(1)or0,999and1orithinkithave:v
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 20/Nov/15
0.9^(−) =1⇒f(0.9^(−) )=f(1)=1  On the other hand f(0.9^(−) )=9.∞=∞  That means to avoid contadiction we should  deny the separte existence of 0.9^(−)  and think ′ it is  nothing but 1′ ?  Similarly f(0.49^(−) )=f(0.5)=5?
0.9=1f(0.9)=f(1)=1Ontheotherhandf(0.9)=9.=Thatmeanstoavoidcontadictionweshoulddenytheseparteexistenceof0.9andthinkitisnothingbut1?Similarlyf(0.49)=f(0.5)=5?
Commented by 123456 last updated on 20/Nov/15
one day in some random math i found  about ⌊0,99...⌋=0 and ⌊1⌋=1 but 0,9..=1  the answer them give are about continuity  of ⌊x⌋, i will search the thing later.
onedayinsomerandommathifoundabout0,99=0and1=1but0,9..=1theanswerthemgiveareaboutcontinuityofx,iwillsearchthethinglater.
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 21/Nov/15
I ′ll wait for update!
Illwaitforupdate!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *