Menu Close

Slightly-modified-form-of-Q-1343-3-log-3x-4-4-log-4x-3-solve-for-x-




Question Number 1354 by Rasheed Ahmad last updated on 25/Jul/15
Slightly modified form of Q 1343.  3^(log(3x+4)) =4^(log(4x+3)) ,solve for x.
SlightlymodifiedformofQ1343.3log(3x+4)=4log(4x+3),solveforx.
Commented by prakash jain last updated on 25/Jul/15
One option to prove that x=0 is the only  solution for ((log (3x+4))/(log (4x+3)))−((log 4)/(log 3))=0 is to  take derivative of the function.  Also if the function has more than one zero  it must change sign twice.
Oneoptiontoprovethatx=0istheonlysolutionforlog(3x+4)log(4x+3)log4log3=0istotakederivativeofthefunction.Alsoifthefunctionhasmorethanonezeroitmustchangesigntwice.
Answered by Yugi last updated on 25/Jul/15
3^(log(3x+4)) =4^(log(4x+3)) .........(1)  Taking logs to base 10 on both sides of (1)  [log(3x+4)]log3=[log(4x+3)]log4  ⇒((log(3x+4))/(log(4x+3)))=((log4)/(log3))...........(2)  Upon observation of theform of (2), the only real   solution is x=0 . A graphical approach yields   the same result since (1) is equivalent to y=0 for  y=3^(log(3x+4)) −4^(log(4x+3))  defined for x>−(3/4).  Numerical methods work as well.  Otherwise, I could not find an algebraic means   of solving for x of the form   ((log(ax+b))/(log(cx+d)))=e where all of a,b,c,d and e are  non−zero reals.
3log(3x+4)=4log(4x+3)(1)Takinglogstobase10onbothsidesof(1)[log(3x+4)]log3=[log(4x+3)]log4log(3x+4)log(4x+3)=log4log3..(2)Uponobservationoftheformof(2),theonlyrealsolutionisx=0.Agraphicalapproachyieldsthesameresultsince(1)isequivalenttoy=0fory=3log(3x+4)4log(4x+3)definedforx>34.Numericalmethodsworkaswell.Otherwise,Icouldnotfindanalgebraicmeansofsolvingforxoftheformlog(ax+b)log(cx+d)=ewhereallofa,b,c,dandearenonzeroreals.
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 10/Aug/15
  I appreciate your approach. But I am doubtful about your  claim that  there is only one real solution (x=0 ).      You correctly derived :                  ((log(3x+4))/(log(4x+3)))=((log4)/(log3))           Taking few  steps more ,we will get,                log(3x+4)=((log 4)/(log 3)) .log(4x+3)                                       =log(4x+3)^((log 4)/(log 3))            Taking antilog of both sides              3x+4=(4x+3)^((log 4)/(log 3))           Observe right hand side the index ((log 4)/(log 3)) >0.            So for positive 4x+3 theRHS must be real, if I am  not wrong. So I think there may be other real solution/s  too.              I agree with you that there is no algebraic way to solve   this equation.But numerical methods may help.
Iappreciateyourapproach.ButIamdoubtfulaboutyourclaimthatthereisonlyonerealsolution(x=0).Youcorrectlyderived:log(3x+4)log(4x+3)=log4log3Takingfewstepsmore,wewillget,log(3x+4)=log4log3.log(4x+3)=log(4x+3)log4log3Takingantilogofbothsides3x+4=(4x+3)log4log3Observerighthandsidetheindexlog4log3>0.Soforpositive4x+3theRHSmustbereal,ifIamnotwrong.SoIthinktheremaybeotherrealsolution/stoo.Iagreewithyouthatthereisnoalgebraicwaytosolvethisequation.Butnumericalmethodsmayhelp.
Commented by Yugi last updated on 25/Jul/15
Considering the form                                                     3x+4=(4x+3)^((log4)/(log3))      ........(∗)  ((log4)/(log3))=log_3 4  is an irrational exponent. As such, the following  numerical approach to  solving for x can be done in order to acquire a polynomial in x (whose real solution  should be found to be approximately x=0). Firstly, consider the value of log_3 4.  log_3 4=1.2618... So to 2 s.f log_3 4≈1.3=((13)/(10))                                   ∴      3x+4=(4x+3)^(13/10)    Raising both sides by the power of 10 gives                                        (3x+4)^(10) =(4x+3)^(13)   While it is possible to expand those binomials to solve for x in f(x)=0 I think it would be easier to define  a function y=(3x+4)^(10) −(4x+3)^(13)   (x>−3/4,x∈R) and use numerical methods  for estimating its root. Graphing yields an answer the fastest.    Now, this gives one estimation for x satisfying (∗). To attain a more accurate  estimate, use more accuarte rational approximations to log_3 4, such as ((63)/(50)),((6309)/(5000)), etc.  Every result of x based on these approximations have different values    but the answers are near zero. What I′ve outlined here is one means  of obtaining x without knowing how many real roots exist for (∗). However,  in general, if x is a negative real number and y is irrational,then all answers of  x^y  are complex. Also, if x is positive (x∈R) and y∈Q^�  then x^y  has only one real  answer and all of the rest are complex. Hence, RHS(∗) should yield one real result.   (Of course I could be wrong. I did some research but I′m just a student who′s here  to learn.)
Consideringtheform3x+4=(4x+3)log4log3..()log4log3=log34isanirrationalexponent.Assuch,thefollowingnumericalapproachtosolvingforxcanbedoneinordertoacquireapolynomialinx(whoserealsolutionshouldbefoundtobeapproximatelyx=0).Firstly,considerthevalueoflog34.log34=1.2618Soto2s.flog341.3=13103x+4=(4x+3)13/10Raisingbothsidesbythepowerof10gives(3x+4)10=(4x+3)13Whileitispossibletoexpandthosebinomialstosolveforxinf(x)=0Ithinkitwouldbeeasiertodefineafunctiony=(3x+4)10(4x+3)13(x>3/4,xR)andusenumericalmethodsforestimatingitsroot.Graphingyieldsananswerthefastest.Now,thisgivesoneestimationforxsatisfying().Toattainamoreaccurateestimate,usemoreaccuarterationalapproximationstolog34,suchas6350,63095000,etc.Everyresultofxbasedontheseapproximationshavedifferentvaluesbuttheanswersarenearzero.WhatIveoutlinedhereisonemeansofobtainingxwithoutknowinghowmanyrealrootsexistfor().However,ingeneral,ifxisanegativerealnumberandyisirrational,thenallanswersofxyarecomplex.Also,ifxispositive(xR)andyQ¯thenxyhasonlyonerealanswerandalloftherestarecomplex.Hence,RHS()shouldyieldonerealresult.(OfcourseIcouldbewrong.IdidsomeresearchbutImjustastudentwhosheretolearn.)
Commented by Rasheed Soomro last updated on 26/Jul/15
I didn′t say ′′ There are certainly more than one soution ′′.  But I said,′′ There may be more than one solution′′  and   suggested to confirm using numerical analysis.One other   suggestion has come from parkash jain for the confirmation.          But during this comment I have drawn the graph.It seems that your claim of  ′′ only   one real solution is correct ′′.   After all we all are learners.
IdidntsayTherearecertainlymorethanonesoution.ButIsaid,Theremaybemorethanonesolutionandsuggestedtoconfirmusingnumericalanalysis.Oneothersuggestionhascomefromparkashjainfortheconfirmation.ButduringthiscommentIhavedrawnthegraph.Itseemsthatyourclaimofonlyonerealsolutioniscorrect.Afterallweallarelearners.
Commented by Yugi last updated on 26/Jul/15
Yes. The graph showed the existence of one real solution.
Yes.Thegraphshowedtheexistenceofonerealsolution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *