i-still-search-about-a-general-and-complete-solution-about-this-determine-x-in-N-where-7-divise-2-x-3-x-note-it-is-just-an-exercise-in-secondary-so-dont-go-away-maybe-we-must-use-separation-of Tinku Tara June 4, 2023 Algebra 0 Comments FacebookTweetPin Question Number 21990 by hi147 last updated on 08/Oct/17 istillsearchaboutageneralandcompletesolutionaboutthisdeterminexinNwhere7divise2x+3xnote=itisjustanexerciseinsecondarysodontgoaway…maybewemustuseseparationofcasesmethode…. Commented by Tinkutara last updated on 11/Oct/17 Igotx≡3(mod6).Isthistrue? Answered by Tinkutara last updated on 11/Oct/17 ByFermat′slittletheorem,26≡1(mod7)⇒26k+r≡2r(mod7)Similarly,36k+r≡3r(mod7)⇒26k+r+36k+r≡2r+3r(mod7)Fork=0andtryingfor0<r<6,21+31≡5(mod7)22+32≡6(mod7)23+33≡0(mod7)24+34≡6(mod7)21+31≡2(mod7)Hencex≡3(mod6). Commented by hi147 last updated on 16/Oct/17 thatsgoodbuthowcanweprovethatitistheonlysolution.imean6k+3.andwehaveanotherproblem=itisjustanexerciseinsecondaryandwedonthavefermatslitteltheoreminthislivel.so….. Terms of Service Privacy Policy Contact: info@tinkutara.com FacebookTweetPin Post navigation Previous Previous post: show-that-1-x-2-1-dx-is-unsolvable-Next Next post: calculate-0-e-nx-dx- Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.