Menu Close

Let-f-N-R-be-a-function-sarisfying-following-conditions-f-1-1-f-1-2f-2-nf-n-n-n-1-f-n-Then-find-the-value-of-49f-49-




Question Number 33048 by rahul 19 last updated on 09/Apr/18
Let f:N→R be a function sarisfying  following conditions:  f(1)=1.  f(1)+2f(2)+....+nf(n)=n(n+1)f(n).  Then find the value of 49f(49) ?
Letf:NRbeafunctionsarisfyingfollowingconditions:f(1)=1.f(1)+2f(2)+.+nf(n)=n(n+1)f(n).Thenfindthevalueof49f(49)?
Commented by rahul 19 last updated on 09/Apr/18
well, i could find out the pattern easily  this time which is (1/(2n)).  But how to do by finding general term?
well,icouldfindoutthepatterneasilythistimewhichis12n.Buthowtodobyfindinggeneralterm?
Commented by rahul 19 last updated on 09/Apr/18
i am not getting correct answer by  that method. after assuming   it to be an^2 +bn+c , i am getting  a=(1/3), b= ((−7)/4) and c= ((29)/(12)).  Someone pls check.
iamnotgettingcorrectanswerbythatmethod.afterassumingittobean2+bn+c,iamgettinga=13,b=74andc=2912.Someoneplscheck.
Commented by MJS last updated on 09/Apr/18
...you already found it.  the polynomial method doesn′t  work with patterns like this,  when you already have a formular  for all n∈N  i.e.  if we know  a_0 =1; a_1 =1; a_2 =2; a_3 =6; a_4 =24  we believe it′s n! but we can  find ∞ functions satisfying  these pairs (n;a_n ), one is a 4^(th) −degree  polynomial  if we know  a_0 =1; a_n =n×a_(n−1)   we know it′s n!, and there′s no  polynome for it [if you find one,  you′ll get the Nobel Price ;−)]
youalreadyfoundit.thepolynomialmethoddoesntworkwithpatternslikethis,whenyoualreadyhaveaformularforallnNi.e.ifweknowa0=1;a1=1;a2=2;a3=6;a4=24webelieveitsn!butwecanfindfunctionssatisfyingthesepairs(n;an),oneisa4thdegreepolynomialifweknowa0=1;an=n×an1weknowitsn!,andtheresnopolynomeforit[ifyoufindone,youllgettheNobelPrice;)]
Commented by MJS last updated on 09/Apr/18
...just saw the other example  there we had to check the  denominator  here this leads to (1/(2n)), no more  calculation necessary
justsawtheotherexampletherewehadtocheckthedenominatorherethisleadsto12n,nomorecalculationnecessary
Commented by rahul 19 last updated on 09/Apr/18
No sir, the terms are  a_1 = 1 , a_2 = (1/4) , a_3 = (1/6) , a_4 =(1/8) ......  ≠ n!
Nosir,thetermsarea1=1,a2=14,a3=16,a4=18n!
Commented by MJS last updated on 09/Apr/18
I know, I wanted to give you  another exanple where the  polynomial approach doesn′t  work
Iknow,Iwantedtogiveyouanotherexanplewherethepolynomialapproachdoesntwork
Commented by rahul 19 last updated on 09/Apr/18
ok, thanks!
ok,thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *