Menu Close

Point-charges-88-C-55-C-and-70-C-are-placed-in-a-straight-line-The-central-one-is-0-75m-from-each-of-the-others-Calculate-the-net-force-on-each-due-to-the-other-two-




Question Number 39573 by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18
Point charges 88μC,−55μC and  70μC are placed in a straight line.  The central one is 0.75m from  each of the others.Calculate the  net force on each due to the other  two.
$${Point}\:{charges}\:\mathrm{88}\mu{C},−\mathrm{55}\mu{C}\:{and} \\ $$$$\mathrm{70}\mu{C}\:{are}\:{placed}\:{in}\:{a}\:{straight}\:{line}. \\ $$$${The}\:{central}\:{one}\:{is}\:\mathrm{0}.\mathrm{75}{m}\:{from} \\ $$$${each}\:{of}\:{the}\:{others}.{Calculate}\:{the} \\ $$$${net}\:{force}\:{on}\:{each}\:{due}\:{to}\:{the}\:{other} \\ $$$${two}. \\ $$
Commented by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18
Please give a diagram if necessary.  Thanks in advance.
$${Please}\:{give}\:{a}\:{diagram}\:{if}\:{necessary}. \\ $$$${Thanks}\:{in}\:{advance}. \\ $$$$ \\ $$
Answered by tanmay.chaudhury50@gmail.com last updated on 08/Jul/18
(F)_(−55) ^(88) =9×10^9 ×((88×10^(−6) ×(−55)×10^(−6) )/((^ 0.75)^2 )) forc on  Q=88μC by (−55μC)  attractive  (F)_(77) ^(88) =9×10^9 ×((88×10^(−6) ×70×10^(−6) )/((1.5)^2 ))   repulsi  so net firce on 88C by othdrs two charge is  (F)_(−55) ^(88) ∼(F)_(70) ^(88)   similar way other can be calculated
$$\left({F}\right)_{−\mathrm{55}} ^{\mathrm{88}} =\mathrm{9}×\mathrm{10}^{\mathrm{9}} ×\frac{\mathrm{88}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} ×\left(−\mathrm{55}\right)×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} }{\left(^{} \mathrm{0}.\mathrm{75}\right)^{\mathrm{2}} }\:{forc}\:{on} \\ $$$${Q}=\mathrm{88}\mu{C}\:{by}\:\left(−\mathrm{55}\mu{C}\right)\:\:{attractive} \\ $$$$\left({F}\right)_{\mathrm{77}} ^{\mathrm{88}} =\mathrm{9}×\mathrm{10}^{\mathrm{9}} ×\frac{\mathrm{88}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} ×\mathrm{70}×\mathrm{10}^{−\mathrm{6}} }{\left(\mathrm{1}.\mathrm{5}\right)^{\mathrm{2}} }\:\:\:{repulsi} \\ $$$${so}\:{net}\:{firce}\:{on}\:\mathrm{88}{C}\:{by}\:{othdrs}\:{two}\:{charge}\:{is} \\ $$$$\left({F}\right)_{−\mathrm{55}} ^{\mathrm{88}} \sim\left({F}\right)_{\mathrm{70}} ^{\mathrm{88}} \:\:{similar}\:{way}\:{other}\:{can}\:{be}\:{calculated} \\ $$$$ \\ $$
Commented by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18
But the textbook says 53N,16N and  37.....Please can you enlighten me  on how they came about these results.
$${But}\:{the}\:{textbook}\:{says}\:\mathrm{53}{N},\mathrm{16}{N}\:{and} \\ $$$$\mathrm{37}…..{Please}\:{can}\:{you}\:{enlighten}\:{me} \\ $$$${on}\:{how}\:{they}\:{came}\:{about}\:{these}\:{results}. \\ $$

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *