Prove-that-n-gt-n-3-n- Tinku Tara June 4, 2023 Number Theory 0 Comments FacebookTweetPin Question Number 13728 by prakash jain last updated on 22/May/17 Provethatn!>(n3)n Answered by mrW1 last updated on 23/May/17 Usingmathematicalinduction:forn=1wehave1!=1>(13)1=13⇒truesupposedit′strueforn,i.e.n!>(n3)nforn+1wehave(n+1)!=(n+1)n!>(n+1)(n3)n=(n+13)n+1(3n+1)(3n+1×n3)n(n+1)=(n+13)n+13(nn+1)n>(n+13)n+1since3(nn+1)n>1(∗seeproof)soit′salsotrueforn+1.⇒it′strueforalln. Commented by prakash jain last updated on 23/May/17 Thisisgreat.Prooffor3(nn+1)n>1Wecanseethat(nn+1)n>(n+1n+2)n+1andlimn→∞(n1+n)n=1e3e>1 Commented by mrW1 last updated on 23/May/17 That′sgoodidea!Iwantedtotrytoprove3(nn+1)n>1alsousingmathematicalinduction. Terms of Service Privacy Policy Contact: info@tinkutara.com FacebookTweetPin Post navigation Previous Previous post: A-light-wire-which-obeys-hooke-s-law-hangs-vertically-on-a-fixed-support-The-wire-has-an-unstretched-lenght-of-15cm-The-lenght-of-the-wire-however-increase-to-20cm-when-a-load-of-0-5kg-is-attached-Next Next post: Prove-that-if-p-gt-q-gt-0-and-x-0-1-p-x-p-p-1-1-1-q-x-q-q-1-1- Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.