Menu Close

Question-107818




Question Number 107818 by mathdave last updated on 12/Aug/20
Commented by hgrocks last updated on 12/Aug/20
No It is not correct   For e.g. put x = 2    L.H.S. = ln^2 (3)  R.H.S = ln2.ln(−3)    lhs ≠ rhs
$$\mathrm{No}\:\mathrm{It}\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{not}\:\mathrm{correct}\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{For}\:\mathrm{e}.\mathrm{g}.\:\mathrm{put}\:\mathrm{x}\:=\:\mathrm{2} \\ $$$$ \\ $$$$\mathrm{L}.\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{S}.\:=\:\mathrm{ln}^{\mathrm{2}} \left(\mathrm{3}\right) \\ $$$$\mathrm{R}.\mathrm{H}.\mathrm{S}\:=\:\mathrm{ln2}.\mathrm{ln}\left(−\mathrm{3}\right) \\ $$$$ \\ $$$$\mathrm{lhs}\:\neq\:\mathrm{rhs} \\ $$
Commented by mathdave last updated on 12/Aug/20
ur opinion is needed house
$${ur}\:{opinion}\:{is}\:{needed}\:{house} \\ $$
Commented by mathdave last updated on 12/Aug/20
ur opinion is needed
$${ur}\:{opinion}\:{is}\:{needed} \\ $$
Answered by mathmax by abdo last updated on 13/Aug/20
not correct
$$\mathrm{not}\:\mathrm{correct}\: \\ $$
Answered by Aziztisffola last updated on 13/Aug/20
not correct ,try with some value of x.
$$\mathrm{not}\:\mathrm{correct}\:,\mathrm{try}\:\mathrm{with}\:\mathrm{some}\:\mathrm{value}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{x}. \\ $$

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *