Menu Close

Show-that-if-3-prime-numbers-all-greater-than-3-form-an-arithmetic-progression-then-the-common-difference-of-the-progression-is-divisible-by-6-




Question Number 92673 by Ar Brandon last updated on 08/May/20
Show that if 3 prime numbers, all greater  than 3, form an arithmetic progression then the common  difference of the progression is divisible by 6.
Showthatif3primenumbers,allgreaterthan3,formanarithmeticprogressionthenthecommondifferenceoftheprogressionisdivisibleby6.
Commented by Rasheed.Sindhi last updated on 09/May/20
In other words:  If  a  &  b are two primes such that  6 ∤ (b−a) then 2b−a is composite.
Inotherwords:Ifa&baretwoprimessuchthat6(ba)then2baiscomposite.
Commented by Ar Brandon last updated on 09/May/20
Interesting Sir. I'll like to get more details please.
Answered by Rasheed.Sindhi last updated on 10/May/20
Let a,b∈P are first two terms  ∴ b−a is common difference  ∴ The Third is b+(b−a)=2b−a  According to the given if (2b−a)∈P  with a,b∈P, then 6∣(b−a).  In other words if 6 ∤ (b−a) then  2b−a is not prime i-e composite.  Proof:  ^• All integers (w. r. t division by 6)   can be categarized into six types:   6k,6k+1,6k+2,...,6k+5.    Among these 6k,6k+2,6k+3 &    6k+4 are obviously composite.    This means primes are only of   two types: 6k+1 & 6k+5   Possibility for prime pair (a,b)    are (6k+1,6k+1) , (6k+1,6k+5)    (6k+5,6k+1) & (6k+5,6k+5)                                 and    b−a will  respectively befall in   types:6k,6k+2,6k+4 &6k.   That means the pairs for which     a,b∈P and 6 ∤ (b−a)     (6k+1,6k+5) & (6k+5,6k+1)                               AND     we′ve to prove for these pairs     that 2b−a(the third term) is     not prime i-e composite. see     the table    determinant ((a,b,(b−a),(2b−a)),((6k+1),(6k+1),(6k_(6∣(b−a)) ),(6k+1)),((6k+1),(6k+5),(6k+4_(6 ∤ (b−a)) ),(6k+3^■ _(NonPrime) )),((6k+5),(6k+1),(6k+2_(6 ∤ (b−a)) ),(6k+3^■ _(NonPrime) )),((6k+5),(6k+5),(6k_(6∣(b−a)) ),(6k+5)))  ^■  6k+3 is nonprime for k>0        that is for a,b>3  Red rows represent that if b−a  (common difference) can′t  be divided by 6, the third term  can′t be prime.  That is if three prime numbers(>3)  are in AP ,then 6 must divide common  difference.                       Q.E.D
Leta,bParefirsttwotermsbaiscommondifferenceTheThirdisb+(ba)=2baAccordingtothegivenif(2ba)Pwitha,bP,then6(ba).Inotherwordsif6(ba)then2baisnotprimeiecomposite.Proof:Allintegers(w.r.tdivisionby6)canbecategarizedintosixtypes:6k,6k+1,6k+2,,6k+5.Amongthese6k,6k+2,6k+3&6k+4areobviouslycomposite.Thismeansprimesareonlyoftwotypes:6k+1&6k+5Possibilityforprimepair(a,b)are(6k+1,6k+1),(6k+1,6k+5)(6k+5,6k+1)&(6k+5,6k+5)andbawillrespectivelybefallintypes:6k,6k+2,6k+4&6k.Thatmeansthepairsforwhicha,bPand6(ba)(6k+1,6k+5)&(6k+5,6k+1)ANDwevetoproveforthesepairsthat2ba(thethirdterm)isnotprimeiecomposite.seethetable|abba2ba6k+16k+16k6(ba)6k+16k+16k+56k+46(ba)6k+3◼NonPrime6k+56k+16k+26(ba)6k+3◼NonPrime6k+56k+56k6(ba)6k+5|◼6k+3isnonprimefork>0thatisfora,b>3Redrowsrepresentthatifba(commondifference)cantbedividedby6,thethirdtermcantbeprime.Thatisifthreeprimenumbers(>3)areinAP,then6mustdividecommondifference.Q.E.D
Commented by Ar Brandon last updated on 10/May/20
Thank you ��

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *