Two-charges-Q-0-and-3Q-0-are-at-l-distance-apart-These-two-charges-are-free-to-move-but-do-not-because-is-a-third-charge-nearby-What-must-be-the-charge-for-the-first-two-to-be-in-equilibrium-

Tinku Tara June 4, 2023 Electrostatics 0 Comments

Question Number 39622 by NECx last updated on 08/Jul/18

Two charges Q_0 and 3Q_0 are at l distance apart.These two charges are free to move but do not because is a third charge nearby.What must be the charge for the first two to be in equilibrium?

$${Two}\:{charges}\:{Q}_{\mathrm{0}} \:{and}\:\mathrm{3}{Q}_{\mathrm{0}} \:{are}\:{at}\:{l} \\ $$$${distance}\:{apart}.{These}\:{two}\:{charges} \\ $$$${are}\:{free}\:{to}\:{move}\:{but}\:{do}\:{not}\:{because} \\ $$$${is}\:{a}\:{third}\:{charge}\:{nearby}.{What}\:{must} \\ $$$${be}\:{the}\:{charge}\:{for}\:{the}\:{first}\:{two}\:{to}\:{be} \\ $$$${in}\:{equilibrium}? \\ $$

Facebook Tweet Pin

Two-charges-Q-0-and-3Q-0-are-at-l-distance-apart-These-two-charges-are-free-to-move-but-do-not-because-is-a-third-charge-nearby-What-must-be-the-charge-for-the-first-two-to-be-in-equilibrium-

Leave a Reply Cancel reply