Menu Close

at-tinkutara-there-are-major-bugs-with-combining-brackets-e-g-typing-A-B-T-writing-A-then-changing-it-to-A-causes-odd-size-glitches-furthermore-while-typing-my-p

Tinku Tara 0 Comments
Pin




Question Number 11218 by FilupS last updated on 17/Mar/17
at tinkutara there are major bugs with combining brackets. e.g. typing: ∣A⟩=(∣B^∗ ⟩)^T writing ∣⟩(∣A)^∗ then changing it to ∣⟩(∣A)^∗ ⟩ causes odd size glitches. furthermore, while typing my previous post, a huge glitch occured where tapping the screen (moving the cursor?) caused the text to get really really big
$$\mathrm{at}\:\mathrm{tinkutara} \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{there}\:\mathrm{are}\:\mathrm{major}\:\mathrm{bugs}\:\mathrm{with}\:\mathrm{combining} \\ $$$$\mathrm{brackets}. \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{e}.\mathrm{g}.\:\mathrm{typing}: \\ $$$$\mid{A}\rangle=\left(\mid{B}^{\ast} \rangle\right)^{\mathrm{T}} \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{writing}\:\mid\rangle\left(\mid{A}\right)^{\ast} \\ $$$$\mathrm{then}\:\mathrm{changing}\:\mathrm{it}\:\mathrm{to}\:\mid\rangle\left(\mid{A}\right)^{\ast} \rangle \\ $$$$\mathrm{causes}\:\mathrm{odd}\:\mathrm{size}\:\mathrm{glitches}. \\ $$$$ \\ $$$$\mathrm{furthermore},\:\mathrm{while}\:\mathrm{typing}\:\mathrm{my}\:\mathrm{previous} \\ $$$$\mathrm{post},\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{huge}\:\mathrm{glitch}\:\mathrm{occured}\:\mathrm{where}\:\mathrm{tapping} \\ $$$$\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{screen}\:\left(\mathrm{moving}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{cursor}?\right)\:\mathrm{caused} \\ $$$$\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{text}\:\mathrm{to}\:\mathrm{get}\:\mathrm{really}\:\mathrm{really}\:\mathrm{big} \\ $$
Commented by FilupS last updated on 17/Mar/17
to see the last glitch, type: ⟨A∣=∣(A⟩)^T and then randomly add and delete, or delete and retype the ⟨⟩ ()^T and ∣ symbols
$$\mathrm{to}\:\mathrm{see}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{last}\:\mathrm{glitch},\:\mathrm{type}: \\ $$$$\langle{A}\mid=\mid\left({A}\rangle\right)^{\mathrm{T}} \: \\ $$$$\mathrm{and}\:\mathrm{then}\:\mathrm{randomly}\:\mathrm{add}\:\mathrm{and}\:\mathrm{delete}, \\ $$$$\mathrm{or}\:\mathrm{delete}\:\mathrm{and}\:\mathrm{retype}\:\mathrm{the}\:\langle\rangle\:\left(\right)^{\mathrm{T}} \:\mathrm{and}\:\mid\:\mathrm{symbols} \\ $$$$ \\ $$
Commented by FilupS last updated on 18/Mar/17
Thanks. Although I like how brakets resize e.g. (((x^2 −1)/2))(x+1) I wish to write using “bra−ket”notation aka Dirac notation, but the rescalling poses a problem. e.g. ⟨A∣B⟩ this is good (⟨A∣)^n ∣B⟩ this is glitchy (try writing this)
$$\mathrm{Thanks}. \\ $$$$\mathrm{Although}\:\mathrm{I}\:\mathrm{like}\:\mathrm{how}\:\mathrm{brakets}\:\mathrm{resize} \\ $$$$\mathrm{e}.\mathrm{g}. \\ $$$$\left(\frac{{x}^{\mathrm{2}} −\mathrm{1}}{\mathrm{2}}\right)\left({x}+\mathrm{1}\right) \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{I}\:\mathrm{wish}\:\mathrm{to}\:\mathrm{write}\:\mathrm{using}\:“\mathrm{bra}−\mathrm{ket}''\mathrm{notation} \\ $$$$\mathrm{aka}\:\mathrm{Dirac}\:\mathrm{notation},\:\mathrm{but}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{rescalling} \\ $$$$\mathrm{poses}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{problem}. \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{e}.\mathrm{g}. \\ $$$$\langle{A}\mid{B}\rangle\:\:\:\:\mathrm{this}\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{good} \\ $$$$\left(\langle{A}\mid\right)^{{n}} \mid{B}\rangle\:\:\:\:\mathrm{this}\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{glitchy}\:\left(\mathrm{try}\:\mathrm{writing}\:\mathrm{this}\right) \\ $$
Commented by Tinku Tara last updated on 17/Mar/17
Thanks for reporting the problem. We will test and fix the issue.
$$\mathrm{Thanks}\:\mathrm{for}\:\mathrm{reporting}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{problem}.\:\mathrm{We} \\ $$$$\mathrm{will}\:\mathrm{test}\:\mathrm{and}\:\mathrm{fix}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{issue}. \\ $$
Commented by FilupS last updated on 18/Mar/17
∣A⟩= ((A_1 ),(A_2 ),(⋮),(A_n ) ) here is an example of a broken ∣A⟩
$$\mid{A}\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}{{A}_{\mathrm{1}} }\\{{A}_{\mathrm{2}} }\\{\vdots}\\{{A}_{{n}} }\end{pmatrix}\:\:\:\:\mathrm{here}\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{an}\:\mathrm{example}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{broken}\:\mid{A}\rangle \\ $$
Commented by FilupS last updated on 18/Mar/17
may I suggest a version of ∣ ∙ ⟩, ⟨ ∙ ∣, ⟨ ∙ ∣ ∙ ⟩, ⟨ ∙ ∣ ∙ ∣ ∙ ⟩, etc, in the function menu? or, maybe provide a version of brackets that don′t have a ′scalling′. I personally like the 2nd option
$$\mathrm{may}\:\mathrm{I}\:\mathrm{suggest}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{version}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mid\:\centerdot\:\rangle,\:\langle\:\centerdot\:\mid,\: \\ $$$$\langle\:\centerdot\:\mid\:\centerdot\:\rangle,\:\langle\:\centerdot\:\mid\:\centerdot\:\mid\:\centerdot\:\rangle,\:\mathrm{etc},\:\mathrm{in}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{function} \\ $$$$\mathrm{menu}? \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{or},\:\mathrm{maybe}\:\mathrm{provide}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{version}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{brackets} \\ $$$$\mathrm{that}\:\mathrm{don}'\mathrm{t}\:\mathrm{have}\:\mathrm{a}\:'\mathrm{scalling}'. \\ $$$$\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{I}\:\mathrm{personally}\:\mathrm{like}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{2nd}\:\mathrm{option} \\ $$
Commented by Tinku Tara last updated on 18/Mar/17
We get the problem, bracket resize in pairs like [ x^2 ,1). We will address the problem or at least provide a manual override to size up or down a particular char
$$\mathrm{We}\:\mathrm{get}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{problem},\:\mathrm{bracket}\:\mathrm{resize} \\ $$$$\mathrm{in}\:\mathrm{pairs}\:\mathrm{like}\:\left[\:{x}^{\mathrm{2}} ,\mathrm{1}\right). \\ $$$$\mathrm{We}\:\mathrm{will}\:\mathrm{address}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{problem}\:\mathrm{or}\:\mathrm{at}\:\mathrm{least} \\ $$$$\mathrm{provide}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{manual}\:\mathrm{override}\:\mathrm{to}\:\mathrm{size} \\ $$$$\mathrm{up}\:\mathrm{or}\:\mathrm{down}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{particular}\:\mathrm{char} \\ $$

Pin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *