Menu Close

Category: Algebra

let-p-be-a-prime-number-amp-let-a-1-a-2-a-3-a-p-be-integers-show-that-there-exists-an-integer-k-such-that-the-numbers-a-1-k-a-2-k-a-3-k-a-p-k-produce-at-least-1-2-p-distinct-

Question Number 194710 by York12 last updated on 14/Jul/23 $${let}\:{p}\:{be}\:{a}\:{prime}\:{number} \\ $$$$\&\:{let}\:{a}_{\mathrm{1}} \:,{a}_{\mathrm{2}} ,{a}_{\mathrm{3}} ,…,{a}_{{p}\:} {be}\:{integers} \\ $$$${show}\:{that}\:,\:{there}\:{exists}\:{an}\:{integer}\:{k}\:{such}\:{that}\:{the}\:{numbers} \\ $$$${a}_{\mathrm{1}} +{k},\:{a}_{\mathrm{2}} +{k},{a}_{\mathrm{3}} +{k},….,{a}_{{p}} +{k} \\…

Question-194695

Question Number 194695 by horsebrand11 last updated on 13/Jul/23 $$\:\:\:\:\:\downharpoonleft\underline{\:} \\ $$ Answered by som(math1967) last updated on 13/Jul/23 $$\boldsymbol{{let}}\:\frac{\boldsymbol{{x}}}{\boldsymbol{{a}}+\boldsymbol{{b}}−\boldsymbol{{c}}}=\frac{\boldsymbol{{y}}}{\boldsymbol{{b}}+\boldsymbol{{c}}−\boldsymbol{{a}}}=\frac{\boldsymbol{{z}}}{\boldsymbol{{c}}+\boldsymbol{{a}}−\boldsymbol{{b}}}=\boldsymbol{{k}} \\ $$$$\boldsymbol{{x}}=\boldsymbol{{k}}\left(\boldsymbol{{a}}+\boldsymbol{{b}}−\boldsymbol{{c}}\right) \\ $$$$\boldsymbol{{y}}=\boldsymbol{{k}}\left(\boldsymbol{{b}}+\boldsymbol{{c}}−\boldsymbol{{a}}\right) \\…

a-1-a-2-a-3-a-n-gt-0-such-that-a-i-0-i-i-1-2-3-4-n-prove-that-2-n-a-1-a-1-a-2-a-1-a-2-a-n-n-1-a-1-2-a-2-2-a-n-2-

Question Number 194634 by York12 last updated on 12/Jul/23 $${a}_{\mathrm{1}} ,{a}_{\mathrm{2}} ,{a}_{\mathrm{3}} ,….,{a}_{{n}} >\mathrm{0}\:{such}\:{that}\:{a}_{{i}} \in\left[\mathrm{0},{i}\right]\: \\ $$$$\forall\:{i}\in\left\{\mathrm{1},\mathrm{2},\mathrm{3},\mathrm{4},…,{n}\right\}\:{prove}\:{that} \\ $$$$\mathrm{2}^{{n}} .{a}_{\mathrm{1}} \left({a}_{\mathrm{1}} +{a}_{\mathrm{2}} \right)…\left({a}_{\mathrm{1}} +{a}_{\mathrm{2}} +…+{a}_{{n}}…

Question-194612

Question Number 194612 by Abdullahrussell last updated on 11/Jul/23 Commented by TheHoneyCat last updated on 15/Jul/23 $$\left.\mathrm{1}\right)\:\mathrm{Let}\:\alpha=\mathrm{1}+\mathrm{2}+\mathrm{3}+\mathrm{4}+\mathrm{5}+\mathrm{6}+\mathrm{7}+\mathrm{8}+\mathrm{9}=\mathrm{45} \\ $$$$\mathrm{be}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{sum}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{all}\:\mathrm{digits}\:\mathrm{in}\:\mathrm{basis}\:\mathrm{10}. \\ $$$$\mathrm{Let}\:{S}_{\mathrm{1}} \:\mathrm{be}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{first}\:\mathrm{sum},\:{S}_{\mathrm{1},\mathrm{0}} \:\mathrm{be}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{sum}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{all} \\ $$$$\mathrm{unit}\:\mathrm{digits},\:{S}_{\mathrm{1},\mathrm{1}}…

where-can-I-learn-about-multiple-sigma-notaions-of-dependent-and-independent-variables-something-like-this-1-i-lt-j-lt-k-1-i-j-k-find-I-want-to-know-what-to-study-

Question Number 194610 by justenspi last updated on 11/Jul/23 $${where}\:{can}\:{I}\:{learn}\:{about}\:{multiple}\:{sigma}\:{notaions} \\ $$$${of}\:{dependent}\:{and}\:{independent}\:{variables} \\ $$$$ \\ $$$${something}\:{like}\:{this} \\ $$$$\underset{\mathrm{1}\leqslant{i}} {\sum}\underset{<{j}} {\sum}\underset{<{k}\leqslant\mathrm{1}} {\sum}\left({i}+{j}+{k}\right)=\lambda \\ $$$${find}\:\lambda \\ $$$${I}\:{want}\:{to}\:{know}\:{what}\:{to}\:{study}…