Question and Answers Forum

All Questions      Topic List

Algebra Questions

Previous in All Question      Next in All Question      

Previous in Algebra      Next in Algebra      

Question Number 114388 by ajfour last updated on 18/Sep/20

Developed the formula for the cubic  equation when it has three real roots  and Cardano is just not suitable as  discriminant gets negative..     Given    x^3 −bx−c=0    with  b>0 , c>0   (t/b)=1+((15)/2)((c^2 /b^3 ))+(√(((c^2 /b^3 ))[49−((75)/4)((c^2 /b^3 ))]))       x=(√(t+((4c^2 )/b^2 ))) −((3c)/b)  ★  mrW Sir, MjS Sir  please check!

$${Developed}\:{the}\:{formula}\:{for}\:{the}\:{cubic} \\ $$ $${equation}\:{when}\:{it}\:{has}\:{three}\:{real}\:{roots} \\ $$ $${and}\:{Cardano}\:{is}\:{just}\:{not}\:{suitable}\:{as} \\ $$ $${discriminant}\:{gets}\:{negative}.. \\ $$ $$\:\:\:{Given}\:\:\:\:\boldsymbol{{x}}^{\mathrm{3}} −\boldsymbol{{bx}}−\boldsymbol{{c}}=\mathrm{0} \\ $$ $$\:\:{with}\:\:\boldsymbol{{b}}>\mathrm{0}\:,\:\boldsymbol{{c}}>\mathrm{0} \\ $$ $$\:\frac{\boldsymbol{{t}}}{\boldsymbol{{b}}}=\mathrm{1}+\frac{\mathrm{15}}{\mathrm{2}}\left(\frac{\boldsymbol{{c}}^{\mathrm{2}} }{\boldsymbol{{b}}^{\mathrm{3}} }\right)+\sqrt{\left(\frac{\boldsymbol{{c}}^{\mathrm{2}} }{\boldsymbol{{b}}^{\mathrm{3}} }\right)\left[\mathrm{49}−\frac{\mathrm{75}}{\mathrm{4}}\left(\frac{\boldsymbol{{c}}^{\mathrm{2}} }{\boldsymbol{{b}}^{\mathrm{3}} }\right)\right]} \\ $$ $$\:\:\:\:\:\boldsymbol{{x}}=\sqrt{\boldsymbol{{t}}+\frac{\mathrm{4}\boldsymbol{{c}}^{\mathrm{2}} }{\boldsymbol{{b}}^{\mathrm{2}} }}\:−\frac{\mathrm{3}\boldsymbol{{c}}}{\boldsymbol{{b}}}\:\:\bigstar \\ $$ $${mrW}\:{Sir},\:{MjS}\:{Sir}\:\:{please}\:{check}! \\ $$

Commented byMJS_new last updated on 18/Sep/20

it′s not exact  x^3 −((244)/3)x−((1456)/(27))=0 ⇒ x∈{−((26)/3), −(2/3), ((28)/3)}  but your formula gives  x≈9.33355157 instead of 9.3^•

$$\mathrm{it}'\mathrm{s}\:\mathrm{not}\:\mathrm{exact} \\ $$ $${x}^{\mathrm{3}} −\frac{\mathrm{244}}{\mathrm{3}}{x}−\frac{\mathrm{1456}}{\mathrm{27}}=\mathrm{0}\:\Rightarrow\:{x}\in\left\{−\frac{\mathrm{26}}{\mathrm{3}},\:−\frac{\mathrm{2}}{\mathrm{3}},\:\frac{\mathrm{28}}{\mathrm{3}}\right\} \\ $$ $$\mathrm{but}\:\mathrm{your}\:\mathrm{formula}\:\mathrm{gives} \\ $$ $${x}\approx\mathrm{9}.\mathrm{33355157}\:\mathrm{instead}\:\mathrm{of}\:\mathrm{9}.\overset{\bullet} {\mathrm{3}} \\ $$

Commented byajfour last updated on 18/Sep/20

yes sir, i found the error! thanks.

$${yes}\:{sir},\:{i}\:{found}\:{the}\:{error}!\:{thanks}. \\ $$

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Contact: info@tinkutara.com