Question and Answers Forum

All Questions      Topic List

Algebra Questions

Previous in All Question      Next in All Question      

Previous in Algebra      Next in Algebra      

Question Number 79974 by TawaTawa last updated on 29/Jan/20

Answered by Rio Michael last updated on 30/Jan/20

 solution    [(p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∨r)] ⇒ (q ∨r)  we know from known facts that    −(p ∨q) is a contingency (neither a tautology nor contradiction)   − (∼p ∨r) is a contingency  so  (p ∨ q) ∧(∼p ∨r) ⇒ contingency.  When ever we use an implication (⇒) for two   contingency′s the result is a tautology.  But  (q ∨r )= contingency  therefore  [(p ∨q) ∨(∼p ∨r)] ⇒ (q ∨r) is a tautology.  formally.   [(p ∨q) ∧(∼p ∨r)] ⇒ (q ∨r) =  [ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼(p ∧r)] ⇒(q ∨r)                                                                  = ∼ [ (∼p ∧∼q) ∨(p ∧r) ⇐(∼q ∨∼r)]                                                                  = ∼( contradiction)                                                                  = tautology

$$\:\boldsymbol{\mathrm{solution}} \\ $$$$\:\:\left[\left({p}\:\vee\:{q}\right)\:\wedge\:\left(\sim{p}\:\vee{r}\right)\right]\:\Rightarrow\:\left({q}\:\vee{r}\right) \\ $$$$\mathrm{we}\:\mathrm{know}\:\mathrm{from}\:\mathrm{known}\:\mathrm{facts}\:\mathrm{that}\: \\ $$$$\:−\left({p}\:\vee{q}\right)\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{contingency}\:\left(\mathrm{neither}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{tautology}\:\mathrm{nor}\:\mathrm{contradiction}\right) \\ $$$$\:−\:\left(\sim{p}\:\vee{r}\right)\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{contingency} \\ $$$$\mathrm{so}\:\:\left(\mathrm{p}\:\vee\:{q}\right)\:\wedge\left(\sim{p}\:\vee{r}\right)\:\Rightarrow\:\mathrm{contingency}. \\ $$$$\mathrm{When}\:\mathrm{ever}\:\mathrm{we}\:\mathrm{use}\:\mathrm{an}\:\mathrm{implication}\:\left(\Rightarrow\right)\:\mathrm{for}\:\mathrm{two}\: \\ $$$$\mathrm{contingency}'\mathrm{s}\:\mathrm{the}\:\mathrm{result}\:\mathrm{is}\:\mathrm{a}\:\mathrm{tautology}. \\ $$$$\mathrm{But}\:\:\left({q}\:\vee{r}\:\right)=\:{contingency} \\ $$$${therefore}\:\:\left[\left({p}\:\vee{q}\right)\:\vee\left(\sim{p}\:\vee{r}\right)\right]\:\Rightarrow\:\left({q}\:\vee{r}\right)\:{is}\:{a}\:{tautology}. \\ $$$$\boldsymbol{\mathrm{formally}}. \\ $$$$\:\left[\left({p}\:\vee{q}\right)\:\wedge\left(\sim{p}\:\vee{r}\right)\right]\:\Rightarrow\:\left({q}\:\vee{r}\right)\:=\:\:\left[\:\left({p}\:\vee\:{q}\right)\:\wedge\:\sim\left({p}\:\wedge{r}\right)\right]\:\Rightarrow\left({q}\:\vee{r}\right) \\ $$$$\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:=\:\sim\:\left[\:\left(\sim{p}\:\wedge\sim{q}\right)\:\vee\left({p}\:\wedge{r}\right)\:\Leftarrow\left(\sim{q}\:\vee\sim{r}\right)\right] \\ $$$$\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:=\:\sim\left(\:{contradiction}\right) \\ $$$$\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:=\:{tautology} \\ $$$$ \\ $$

Commented by TawaTawa last updated on 03/Feb/20

God bless you sir

$$\mathrm{God}\:\mathrm{bless}\:\mathrm{you}\:\mathrm{sir} \\ $$

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Contact: info@tinkutara.com