All Questions Topic List
Algebra Questions
Previous in All Question Next in All Question
Previous in Algebra Next in Algebra
Question Number 79974 by TawaTawa last updated on 29/Jan/20
Answered by Rio Michael last updated on 30/Jan/20
solution[(p∨q)∧(∼p∨r)]⇒(q∨r)weknowfromknownfactsthat−(p∨q)isacontingency(neitheratautologynorcontradiction)−(∼p∨r)isacontingencyso(p∨q)∧(∼p∨r)⇒contingency.Wheneverweuseanimplication(⇒)fortwocontingency′stheresultisatautology.But(q∨r)=contingencytherefore[(p∨q)∨(∼p∨r)]⇒(q∨r)isatautology.formally.[(p∨q)∧(∼p∨r)]⇒(q∨r)=[(p∨q)∧∼(p∧r)]⇒(q∨r)=∼[(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∧r)⇐(∼q∨∼r)]=∼(contradiction)=tautology
Commented by TawaTawa last updated on 03/Feb/20
Godblessyousir
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Contact: info@tinkutara.com